<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fonera big disk support, testers needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fonosfera.org/fonera-big-disk-support-testers-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/fonera-big-disk-support-testers-needed/</link>
	<description>News from Fon development community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 22:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filipe Dias</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/fonera-big-disk-support-testers-needed/#comment-198218</link>
		<dc:creator>Filipe Dias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=163#comment-198218</guid>
		<description>It was NTFS. I formated to ext3 and now I get arround 3MB/s - 4MB/s... still slow but better then before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was NTFS. I formated to ext3 and now I get arround 3MB/s &#8211; 4MB/s&#8230; still slow but better then before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthijs</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/fonera-big-disk-support-testers-needed/#comment-198209</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=163#comment-198209</guid>
		<description>@Filipe, are you using the NTFS filesystem, perhaps? That&#039;s known to be CPU intensive and since the Foneras don&#039;t have a blazingly fast CPU, the bandwidth is limited. Using FAT32 or ext3 should be faster, if that&#039;s an option for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Filipe, are you using the NTFS filesystem, perhaps? That&#8217;s known to be CPU intensive and since the Foneras don&#8217;t have a blazingly fast CPU, the bandwidth is limited. Using FAT32 or ext3 should be faster, if that&#8217;s an option for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filipe Dias</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/fonera-big-disk-support-testers-needed/#comment-196335</link>
		<dc:creator>Filipe Dias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=163#comment-196335</guid>
		<description>Hello!

I&#039;ve this firmware installed. I get very low speeds on file transfers via Windows Share and FTP.

1,5MB/s to 3,0MB/s max.

This is really slow... it&#039;s faster to me to download something from the internet than from my own hard drive.

Any hint on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve this firmware installed. I get very low speeds on file transfers via Windows Share and FTP.</p>
<p>1,5MB/s to 3,0MB/s max.</p>
<p>This is really slow&#8230; it&#8217;s faster to me to download something from the internet than from my own hard drive.</p>
<p>Any hint on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
