<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment policy &#038; asking questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fonosfera.org/comment-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/comment-policy/</link>
	<description>News from Fon development community</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthijs</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/comment-policy/#comment-23916</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=145#comment-23916</guid>
		<description>Luckily I noticed the spammer after "only" three hours and managed to teach our spamfilter to filter them. Next up is removing 150 spam comments :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily I noticed the spammer after &#8220;only&#8221; three hours and managed to teach our spamfilter to filter them. Next up is removing 150 spam comments :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben10</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/comment-policy/#comment-23911</link>
		<dc:creator>ben10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=145#comment-23911</guid>
		<description>Hey Matthijs, those f....g spammers are filling up the fonosfera tickets with their spam crap. 

Looking forward to a final 2.0g release since I like that device a lot and I think it may suit many users needs (besides its a nice device, more than 2.0n).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matthijs, those f&#8230;.g spammers are filling up the fonosfera tickets with their spam crap. </p>
<p>Looking forward to a final 2.0g release since I like that device a lot and I think it may suit many users needs (besides its a nice device, more than 2.0n).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piter</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/comment-policy/#comment-23386</link>
		<dc:creator>Piter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=145#comment-23386</guid>
		<description>Matthijs,
we really appreciate the "openness" Fon has achieved with your envolvement here.
Personally I NEVER posted comments blaming or offending Fon, just some complaint for their silence about important issues and observations to the 2.0n awful firmwares...
And I agree with Schunz, about unresponsiveness of Fon with other communication channels: email, forum (with some nasty and rude users) and even in the knowledge base, in which I haven't received answers about two critical issues.
I'm sorry to say that Fon lost its credibility in last two years.

Regards,
Piter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthijs,<br />
we really appreciate the &#8220;openness&#8221; Fon has achieved with your envolvement here.<br />
Personally I NEVER posted comments blaming or offending Fon, just some complaint for their silence about important issues and observations to the 2.0n awful firmwares&#8230;<br />
And I agree with Schunz, about unresponsiveness of Fon with other communication channels: email, forum (with some nasty and rude users) and even in the knowledge base, in which I haven&#8217;t received answers about two critical issues.<br />
I&#8217;m sorry to say that Fon lost its credibility in last two years.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Piter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthijs</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/comment-policy/#comment-23384</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=145#comment-23384</guid>
		<description>Hey schunz,

just to clarify: This post isn't intended to accuse our users of anything, I'm just trying to clear up things for the future. I don't think we can really blame our users for getting frustrated, let's just try to prevent that in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey schunz,</p>
<p>just to clarify: This post isn&#8217;t intended to accuse our users of anything, I&#8217;m just trying to clear up things for the future. I don&#8217;t think we can really blame our users for getting frustrated, let&#8217;s just try to prevent that in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schunz</title>
		<link>http://blog.fonosfera.org/comment-policy/#comment-23368</link>
		<dc:creator>schunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fonosfera.org/?p=145#comment-23368</guid>
		<description>Up until now Fon was unhelpful independent of the medium I used: email, forum, IRC, and comments in this blog. 
We users only get angry because of the afwul communication from fon. I hope this will change now. Users will behave themselves, if they feel properly treated by fon. This hasn't often been the case in the last year. Broken promises, unresponsiveness on fon's part is the reason for all the bad blood.

At last this seems to change. But I'll wait a while before I getting enthusiastic about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up until now Fon was unhelpful independent of the medium I used: email, forum, IRC, and comments in this blog.<br />
We users only get angry because of the afwul communication from fon. I hope this will change now. Users will behave themselves, if they feel properly treated by fon. This hasn&#8217;t often been the case in the last year. Broken promises, unresponsiveness on fon&#8217;s part is the reason for all the bad blood.</p>
<p>At last this seems to change. But I&#8217;ll wait a while before I getting enthusiastic about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

